Ag exporter · About 3,300 forty-foot containers (6,600 TEU) / year of alfalfa and timothy hay through Seattle, Tacoma and Portland
A hay exporter recovered or invalidated 62% of billed detention by proving rolled bookings and late receiving windows
Export detention was the exporter's largest controllable cost after freight. ATAHSKIA tied every billed day to the booking's earliest return date, cutoff and roll history, then sent cited disputes inside the relief window. In 12 months the exporter recovered or invalidated $259,000 of $418,000 billed, 4.3 times the total cost of the platform.
- 62%
- Billed detention recovered or invalidated
- $259K
- Recovered in 12 months
- 4.3x
- Return on total platform cost
The challenge
The exporter compresses and ships alfalfa and timothy hay to buyers in Asia and the Middle East, about 3,300 forty-foot containers a year through the Northwest Seaport Alliance terminals in Seattle and Tacoma and through Portland. Empties are picked up at terminals and depots, trucked to presses in central Washington and Oregon, loaded and returned as export loads.
That round trip is exposed to every schedule change. When a vessel slipped, the earliest return date moved and loaded containers waited on chassis in the exporter's yard while detention ran. When a booking was rolled, the same containers were billed for days the carrier's own decision had created. Each season the exporter paid more than $400,000 in detention and disputed almost none of it, because no one could assemble the booking history for hundreds of containers in time.
The approach
Booking history captured per container
Milestone & Gate Tracking recorded every booking's original and revised ERD, cargo cutoff and vessel, along with empty outgate and export ingate events, so each container had a dated history of the receiving window it was actually given.
ERD and cutoff checks on every invoice
The OSRA Audit Engine flagged export invoices missing the earliest return date required by § 541.6(b)(7), and compared billed days with the receiving window. Days between the original and revised ERD, and days caused by rolls, were separated from days the exporter controlled.
Roll-driven charges disputed against the certification
Where detention followed a roll, Automated Disputes cited the § 541.6(e) certification that the billing party's performance did not cause or contribute to the charges, with the roll notice and the original booking confirmation attached. ERD shifts were argued under the incentive principle in 46 CFR § 545.5.
Scorecards for booking decisions
Carrier Scorecards ranked each carrier serving the exporter's lanes by invoice compliance, dispute acceptance and response time. The exporter used the results when allocating bookings for the next season.
The results
- Over 12 months, carriers billed $418,000 in detention. The exporter recovered or had invalidated $259,000, 62% of the billed total.
- On the Enterprise BCO plan the total cost was $60,480: $29,400 in platform fees plus a 12% success fee of $31,080. Recoveries were 4.3 times that cost, a net gain of $198,520.
- 212 containers were billed detention after a rolled booking; credits or withdrawals were obtained on 171 of them.
- Every dispute in the period was sent inside the § 541.8 relief window, and the average billing party response came back in 17 days.
“A rolled booking used to cost us twice: once in the schedule and again on the detention bill. Now the roll notice goes straight into the dispute, and most carriers take the days off without an argument.”
Don't let your 30-day dispute window expire.
Send your recent D&D invoices for a free audit. We report what is recoverable within 48 hours.